Vorbereitungen der US-Administration

Aus 9/11 Wiki

(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(Das Ändern von Befehlsstrukturen vor dem 11.9.2001.)
 
Zeile 26: Zeile 26:
11
11
June 1, 2001: Revised Hijacking Procedure Outlines Defense Department Responsibilities
June 1, 2001: Revised Hijacking Procedure Outlines Defense Department Responsibilities
-
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a060101newpolicy#a060101newpolicy
+
<ref>http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a060101newpolicy#a060101newpolicy</ref>
A military instruction is issued by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlining the
A military instruction is issued by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlining the
procedure for dealing with hijackings within the United States. The instruction, titled
procedure for dealing with hijackings within the United States. The instruction, titled

Aktuelle Version vom 25. Februar 2011, 18:27 Uhr

Der 11.9.2001 als Gelegenheit für Politikgestaltung in der US-Administration

Die Häufigkeit, in der Mitlieder der US-Administration von einer Chance, einer Gelegenheit sprachen, die ihnen der 11.9.2001 ermöglich[t]e, [spricht für sich.] Donald Rumsfeld, Interview mit der New York Times," New York Times, Oktober 12, 2001. Zitat:

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld said that 9/11 created "the kind of opportunities that World
War II offered, to refashion the world."

George W. Bush, State of the Union, 29.01.2002: Zitat:

We've been offered a unique opportunity, and we must not let this moment pass." [1]

Es gibt derer noch mehr Aussagen. Das nur exemplarisch. Thematisch gehört hierzu auch die Einordnung des Geschehens als Neues Pearl Harbor, was nicht zufällig erfolgt ist, sondern System hatte, wie [ich] hier beweisen konnte:[2]


Das Ändern von Befehlsstrukturen vor dem 11.9.2001.

Hier wird es etwas vage, weil natürlich so etwas nicht in der New York Times veröffentlicht wird, aber es gibt ernstzunehmende Hinweise, dass der "Chain of Command", was z.B. bei Flugzeugentführungen passieren sollte, in den Monaten vor dem 11.9.2001 dem Militär entzogen und dem Weißen Haus (Rumsfeld) zugekommen ist. Ausgerechnet Rumsfeld war aber in den ersten 2 Stunden des Anschlags unauffindbar- statt seinen Job zu machen, lief er noch nach 9:35 vor dem Pentagon rum, um den Verletzten zu helfen. Heroisch, echt, aber völlig deplaziert, wenn die USA "Under Attack" sind und er der oberste militärische Befehlsgeber als "Verteidigungs"minister [wichtige Befehle bzw. Anordnungen hätte treffen müssen.] 11 June 1, 2001: Revised Hijacking Procedure Outlines Defense Department Responsibilities [3] A military instruction is issued by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlining the procedure for dealing with hijackings within the United States. The instruction, titled “Aircraft Piracy (Hijacking) and Destruction of Derelict Airborne Objects,” states that “the administrator, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), has exclusive responsibility to direct law enforcement activity related to actual or attempted aircraft piracy (hijacking) in the ‘special aircraft jurisdiction’ of the United States. When requested by the administrator, Department of Defense will provide assistance to these law enforcement efforts.” It adds that the National Military Command Center (NMCC) within the Pentagon “is the focal point within Department of Defense for providing assistance. In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses as authorized by reference d, forward requests for DOD assistance to the secretary of defense for approval.” [US Department of Defense, 6/1/2001 pdf file] Some will later assume that this requirement for defense secretary approval was new with this instruction. [New York Observer, 6/17/2004] But it has in fact been a requirement since 1997, when the previous instruction was issued, if not earlier. [US Department of Defense, 7/31/1997 pdf file] Although the defense secretary has this responsibility, the 9/11 Commission will conclude that, on the day of 9/11, the “secretary of defense did not enter the chain of command until the morning’s key events were over.” [9/11 Commission, 7/24/2004, pp. 15 pdf file] Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld will later incorrectly claim that, up to 9/11, terrorism and dome4stic hijackings were “a law enforcement issue.” [9/11 Commission, 3/23/2004; PBS, 3/25/2004; US Department of Defense, 6/14/2005] (auch wenn die Befehlstruktur vorher ähnlich in Kraft war, das nochmalige Heraustellen der Rolle Rumsfelds und seine anschließende Inaktivität sind glasklare "Inside Job"-Hinweise.) Siehe auch: http://www.911blogger.com/node/16623 Hier wurde ganz klar versucht, durch eine vorgeblich humanitäre Tat Nichtstun zu verschleiern.

Cheney, die Spinne im Netz, COG, Wargames

Dick Cheney soll mit einer ähnlichen "Verfahrensänderung" der Maestro aller Wargames geworden sein, der Secret Service ist in Notfällen ermächtigt, alle Macht an sich zu reißen, es gab auch vor dem 11.9.2001 "continuity of government plans", die höchstwahrscheinlich zur Ausführung kamen und evtl. nie wieder ausgesetzt wurden. Erklären würde das, warum die US-Regierung völlig unbesorgt über "Impeachment" und anderes sein konnte, selbst Wahlen...

Ruppert says he has established conclusively that “in May of 2001, by presidential order, Richard Cheney was put in direct command and control of all wargame and field exercise training and scheduling through several agencies, especially FEMA. This also extended to all of the conflicting and overlapping NORAD drills on that day.” [4] The morning of 9/11, a highly secret plan was activated for the first time. Called continuity of government (COG), it dated back to the cold war and had originally been designed to ensure the U.S. government would continue to function in the event of a nuclear war. According to author James Mann, this little-known plan "helps to explain the thinking and behavior" of the Bush administration, "in the hours, days, and months after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001." [5] Siehe auch:[6]


  1. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html
  2. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html
  3. http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a060101newpolicy#a060101newpolicy
  4. http://www.geocities.com/kidhistory/bcr911.htm
  5. http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=sMfjZVJK_x0&eurl=http://www.911blogger.com/blog/308
  6. http://www.911blogger.com/node/16733
Persönliche Werkzeuge