FEMA
Aus 9/11 Wiki
(→Quellen und weiterführende Links) |
(→Kritik) |
||
| Zeile 16: | Zeile 16: | ||
Die amerikanische Feuerwehr-Zeitschrift Fire Engeneering fand außergewöhnlich deutliche Worte in Ihrer Kritik am FEMA-Report: | Die amerikanische Feuerwehr-Zeitschrift Fire Engeneering fand außergewöhnlich deutliche Worte in Ihrer Kritik am FEMA-Report: | ||
| - | "No. Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members- described by one close source as a "tourist trip"-no one's checking the evidence for anything."[1] | + | "No. Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members- described by one close source as a "tourist trip"-no one's checking the evidence for anything."([[#1]]) |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Version vom 14. September 2010, 09:42 Uhr
Im Mai 2002 veröffentlichte die Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) ihren Report World Trade Center Building Performance Study.
Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Überblick
Untersuchungen
FEMA: „Die Besonderheiten der Feuer im WTC 7 und wie sie das Gebäude zum Kollabieren brachten bleiben unbekannt zudieser Zeit. Obwohl der komplette Dieseltreibstoff im Gebäude eine massive potentielle Energie besaß, hat die beste Hypothese nur eine geringe Auftrittswahrscheinlichkeit. Weitere Forschung, Untersuchungen und Analysen werden benötigt, um diese Angelegenheit zu klären“ (#2).
Kritik
Die amerikanische Feuerwehr-Zeitschrift Fire Engeneering fand außergewöhnlich deutliche Worte in Ihrer Kritik am FEMA-Report:
"No. Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members- described by one close source as a "tourist trip"-no one's checking the evidence for anything."(#1)
